The Danielle Harness applied to medical records. Ingest the full chart — handwritten physician and nurse notes, scanned and faxed pages, EHR exports, imaging, op reports, hundreds of pages across dozens of providers — and emit the artifact your team actually ships: a cited timeline, a necessity decision, a CRF, an appeal packet. Chart reads the messy ones too. Every span tied to a page in the chart, every conclusion tied to a rule in your playbook.
Handwritten progress notes, order sheets, bedside charts. OCR’d and transcribed; low-confidence spans flagged for review, never silently guessed.
Skewed scans, fax headers, stamps, multi-generation copies. Read page by page, with the page image kept beside every cited span.
Mixed EHR exports, PDFs, and images from dozens of providers. Normalized into one indexed record — and still cited back to the exact source page.
Healthcare ingestion is the hard part — the chart is fragmented across portals, scanned PDFs, and faxes. The Harness normalizes it once and runs every downstream workflow against the same indexed record.
Personal injury, med-mal, workers' comp. Ingest the full chart — ER, imaging, op reports, progress notes — and emit a timeline, causation map, and damages-relevant excerpts cited to the page.
Health plans and TPAs. Read the chart against medical necessity criteria (MCG, InterQual, plan-specific) and emit a decision packet with the cited evidence and the gap analysis.
Read provider submissions and the supporting chart against your auth criteria. Emit an approve/deny recommendation with the cited clinical evidence and the precise criterion satisfied or missed.
Sponsor and CRO chart abstraction. Read the chart against the protocol's data dictionary and emit case report form drafts with the source-data verification trail already attached.
The output is a diff against the criterion, not a clinical narrative. Every event, every necessity finding, every appeal argument cites a page in the chart. The denial sits beside the evidence that contradicts it. Danielle never paraphrases or re-renders the record — every conclusion cites the exact source page, and for scanned or handwritten pages the original page image is kept beside the citation.
Read the chart against medical necessity criteria at portfolio scale, with the citation trail every appeal will demand.
Chart review that emits a cited timeline and a causation map fast enough to actually use in expert prep.
Abstraction against the protocol's data dictionary with source-data verification built into the artifact, not bolted on after.
Read the chart against payer policy and coding guidelines before the claim goes out the door — not after the denial comes back.
Chart is the Harness with a medical playbook loaded into it. The index normalizes encounters and visits. The playbook is your necessity criteria, your protocol, or your litigation theory. The verifier checks every emitted conclusion against the source page in the chart. Nothing reaches clinical or legal review unverified.
Pick a workflow to put Chart on — a claims queue, a med-mal docket, a protocol cohort. We calibrate the playbook against your work and run it for 30 days.
team@danielle.legal